MUMFORD v. BASINSKI

No. 95-4127.

105 F.3d 264 (1997)

David M. MUMFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. David A. BASINSKI, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided January 23, 1997.

Rehearing and Suggestion for Rehearing Denied March 7, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dennis J. Niermann (argued and briefed), Kramer & Niermann, Cleveland, OH, for plaintiff-appellant.

M. Robert Flanagan (argued and briefed), Office of Prosecuting Attorney, Elyria, OH, Richard Osborn Wuerth (briefed), Lane, Alton & Horst, Columbus, OH, for defendants-appellees.

Before: KRUPANSKY, BOGGS, and SILER, Circuit Judges.


Rehearing and Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc Denied March 7, 1997.

KRUPANSKY, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff-appellant, David M. Mumford ("Mumford"), has contested the district court's dismissal, as moot, of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim against Judge David A. Basinski ("Basinski"), the successor in office of Mumford's former employer, former Judge Joseph C. Zieba ("Zieba"), who during his judicial tenure was the Administrative Judge of the Lorain County...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases