The motion court correctly held that under Workers' Compensation Law § 56, and, more particularly, plaintiff's Rate Manual to which defendant's policy was subject, defendant, a common carrier licensed to transport vehicles, was a contractor liable for the payment of premiums for drivers employed by other carriers defendant had engaged to perform some of its own contracts (see, Matter of Anslow v Spring, 272 App Div 1091). Moreover, because defendant never...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
