Ilsa GUILLEN et al., Plaintiffs,
v.
CITY OF CHICAGO, et al., Defendants.
United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
March 3, 1997.
March 3, 1997.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Robert Orman, Law Office of Robert Orman, Chicago, IL, Jeffrey H. Haas, Janis M. Susler, People's Law Offices, Chicago, IL, Jeffrey Wayne Finke, Raleigh and Helms, Chicago, IL, for Lizbeth Guillen, Christopher Guillen and Ilsa Guillen.
Thomas R. Samson, Irene Schid Caminer, Sharon Baldwin, Margaret Ann Carey, Patricia Jo Kendall, City of Chicago, Law Dept. Corp. Counsel, Chicago, IL, Susan S. Sher, Chicago, IL, Taryn Springs, Board of Educ. of City of Chicago, Chicago, IL, for City of Chicago.
Thomas R. Samson, David Mitchell Zinder, City of Chicago, Law Dept. Corp. Counsel, Chicago, IL, Thomas Joseph Platt, City of Chicago, Law Dept., Chicago, IL, John F. McGuire, City of Chicago Law Dept., Chicago, IL, Taryn Springs, Board of Educ. of City of Chicago, Chicago, IL, for Daniel L. Parise.
Douglas Marshall McMillan, Thomas R. Samson, David Mitchell Zinder, City of Chicago, Law Dept. Corp. Counsel, Chicago, IL, John F. McGuire, City of Chicago Law Dept., Chicago, IL, Taryn Springs, Board of Educ. of City of Chicago, Chicago, IL, for Chris E. Andersen.
Thomas R. Samson, David Mitchell Zinder, City of Chicago, Law Dept. Corp. Counsel, Chicago, IL, John F. McGuire, City of Chicago, Law Dept., Chicago, IL, Taryn Springs, Board of Educ. of City of Chicago, Chicago, IL, for Michael A. Ponti.
Douglas Marshall McMillan, Arlene Esther Martin, Patrick Walter Johnson, City of Chicago, Law Dept. Corp. Counsel, Chicago, IL, Taryn Springs, Board of Educ. of City of Chicago, Chicago, IL, for M. Flynn, P. Leonard, James L. O'Neill, and Linda Fogarty.
United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
GRADY, District Judge.
Before the court is the plaintiffs' motion to (1) prevent the defendants' attorneys from representing two nonparty witnesses during the witnesses' depositions, and (2) interview those witnesses without the defendants' attorneys being present. For the reasons stated in this opinion, the plaintiffs' motion is denied.
I. BACKGROUND
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
