STROUSE v. K-TEK, INC.

No. 22840.

930 P.2d 1361 (1997)

129 Idaho 616

David K. STROUSE III, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. K-TEK, INC., a corporation, M. Keith Barrett and Diane Barrett, husband and wife, and John Does I through V, Defendants-Appellants. K-TEK, INC., a corporation, Counterclaimant-Appellant, v. David K. STROUSE III, Counterdefendant-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Idaho.

January 29, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hepworth, Lezamiz & Hohnhorst, Twin Falls, for defendants-appellants.

Ellsworth, May, Sudweeks, Stubbs, Ipsen & Perry, Twin Falls, for plaintiff-respondent.


PERRY, Judge.

In this case, David K. Strouse III sought monetary damages for the breach of an employment contract. He alleged that K-tek, Inc., owed him $21,252 for services rendered. After a court trial, the district court found that K-tek owed Strouse a lesser amount. On appeal, K-tek challenges the factual finding of the district court regarding the amount that K-tek had previously paid Strouse. K-tek alleges that Strouse made a binding judicial admission that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases