1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 966 F.Supp.
  5. 966 F.Supp. 977 (1997)
 

ROE v. ANDERSON

No. CIV-S-97-0529 DFL.

966 F.Supp. 977 (1997)

Brenda ROE and Anna Doe, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Eloise ANDERSON, Director of the California Department of Social Services; California Department of Social Services; Pete Wilson, Governor of the State of California; Craig Brown, Director of the California Department of Finance, Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. California.

June 4, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jordon C. Budd, ACLU Foundation, San Diego and Imperial Counties, San Diego, CA, David S. Schwartz, Mark D. Rosenbaum, ACLU Foundation of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, Martha F. Davis, NOW Legal Defense and Education Fund, New York City, for Plaintiffs.

Theodore Garelis, Office of Attorney General, Sacramento, CA, for Defendants.

MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER

LEVI, District Judge.

This case again presents the question of the constitutionality of a one-year durational residency requirement for full welfare benefits. A California statute, enacted in 1992, provides that "families that have resided in this state for less than 12 months" and who qualify for welfare shall receive benefits no greater than the "maximum aid payment that would have been received by that family from...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases