COLE v. SHULTS-LEWIS CHILD & FAM. SERV.

No. 64A05-9510-CV-400.

681 N.E.2d 1157 (1997)

Michelle COLE as Personal Representative of the Estate of Jane F. Doe, and Jane I. Doe, Appellants-Plaintiffs, v. SHULTS-LEWIS CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES, INC., Appellee-Defendant.

Court of Appeals of Indiana.

June 25, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gregory Bowes, Indianapolis, for appellant.

Mark A. Lienhoop, David P. Jones, Newby, Lewis, Kaminski & Jones, LaPorte, for appellee.


ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

RUCKER, Judge.

In our original opinion we did not reach the substance of Shults-Lewis's argument concerning the alleged lack of reliable scientific principles on which the phenomenon of repressed memory is based. Doe v. Shults-Lewis, 677 N.E.2d 1069 (Ind.Ct.App. 1997). We observed that rather than object or move to strike an affidavit in which the subject was discussed, Shults-Lewis, in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases