POTTER v. PATTERSON

Nos. 96-CA-1172, 96-CA-1739.

690 So.2d 1118 (1997)

Carolyn POTTER, et al. v. A.B. PATTERSON, et al.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit.

Rehearing Denied April 15, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gerolyn P. Roussel, Perry J. Roussel, Jr., Roussel & Roussel, LaPlace, for Plaintiffs/Appellees Lucille H. Potter, June Carol Potter Liemann and John Potter, Jr.

Charlton B. Ogden, III, Carter B. Wright, Monroe & Lemann, New Orleans, for Lou Shirley, Ed Kimball and NOPSI.

Andrew L. Plauché, Jr., Plauché, Maselli & Landry, New Orleans, for John Crane, Inc.

Stephen N. Elliott, Dawn M. Palmisano, Bernard, Cassisa & Elliott, Metairie, for Reilly-Benton.

Dominic Ovella, Valerie Schexnayder, Hailey, McNamara, Hall, Larmann & Papale, Metairie, for Flintkote.

Glenn B. Adams, Porteous, Hainkel, Johnson & Sarpy, New Orleans, for Fibreboard Corporation.

Anthony J. Staines, Valerie A. Young, Staines, Eppling & Meyers, Metairie, for Richard Klinger, Inc.

Michael T. Cali, Frilot, Partridge, Kohnke & Clements, New Orleans, for Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation.

Leon Gary, Jr., William L. Schuette, Jr., Madeleine Fischer, Jennifer L. Anderson, Jones, Walker, Waechter, Poitevent, Carrere & Denegre, Baton Rouge, for Westinghouse Electric Corporation.

Troy N. Bell, Aultman, Tyner, McNeese, Ruffin & Laird, New Orleans, for Garlock, Inc. and Anchor Packing.

C. Kelly Lightfoot, Hailey, McNamara, Hall, Larmann & Papale, Metairie, for Taylor-Seidenbach, Inc.

Robert E. Kerrigan, Jr., A. Wendel Stout, III, Janet MacDonell, Gary B. Roth, William C. Harrison, Lisa C. Winter, Deutsch, Kerrigan & Stiles, New Orleans, for Armstrong World Industries.

Susan B. Kohn, Simon, Peragine, Smith & Redfearn, New Orleans, for McCarty Corporation.

Before BYRNES, ARMSTRONG and JONES, JJ.


ARMSTRONG, Judge.

This case involves a mistaken voluntary dismissal with prejudice of an entire personal injury action despite the fact that only one of several defendants had settled with the plaintiffs. The trial court ruled that the mistaken judgment is a nullity. We find that the mistaken judgment could have and should have been set aside upon the plaintiffs' motion for new trial and we need not reach the question of nullity. Thus, we affirm the result reached...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases