GRUSHOFF v. DENNY'S INC.

No. 96-1414.

693 So.2d 1068 (1997)

Kenna GRUSHOFF, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. DENNY'S, INC. and T.W. Holdings, Inc., Appellees/Cross-Appellants.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 14, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael D. Gelety, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant/cross-appellee.

Neil Rose, North Bay Village, and Joel E. Bernstein of Bernstein & Chackman, P.A., Hollywood, for appellee/cross-appellant Denny's, Inc.


WARNER, Judge.

The trial court granted a new trial after the appellant's (plaintiff below) verdict in a personal injury suit on the basis that the appellant's attorney had made an improper golden rule argument. The trial court entered its order prior to the decision in Cleveland Clinic Florida v. Wilson, 685 So.2d 15 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996), in which we held that golden rule arguments are not per se reversible errors. Based on...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases