NATIONAL PRESTO INDUSTRIES, INC. v. DAZEY CORP.

No. 96-1162.

107 F.3d 1576 (1997)

NATIONAL PRESTO INDUSTRIES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DAZEY CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

March 6, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jerold A. Jacover, Brinks Hofer Gilson & Lione, Chicago, IL, argued, for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was Philip A. Jones.

Gerald M. Kraai, Litman, McMahon & Brown, L.L.C., Kansas City, MO, argued, for defendant-appellee. Of counsel were Paul J. Korniczky, Leydig, Voit & Mayer, Ltd., Chicago, IL, and Mark G. Arnold, Husch & Eppenberger, St. Louis, MO.

Before LOURIE, Circuit Judge, SKELTON, Senior Circuit Judge, and RADER, Circuit Judge.


RADER, Circuit Judge.

Dazey Corporation (Dazey) filed an "emergency motion" with the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, seeking a declaration of its rights under a settlement agreement that had terminated its prior litigation with National Presto Industries, Inc. (Presto). After the district court ruled in Presto's favor on the merits of the motion, Dazey moved to dismiss the action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases