1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 132 F.3d
  5. 132 F.3d 1311 (1997)
 

GIBSON BY GIBSON v. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE

No. 96-56369.

132 F.3d 1311 (1997)

Douglas Arnold GIBSON, by his Guardian ad litem Douglas Arnold GIBSON, Individually and on Behalf of Individuals Similarly Situated and the General Public; Diane Marie Gibson, by her Guardian ad litem Douglas Arnold Gibson, Individually and on Behalf of Individuals Similarly Situated and the General Public; Dustin Gibson, by his Guardian ad litem Douglas Arnold Gibson, Individually and on Behalf of Individuals Similarly Situated and the General Public; Daniel Gibson, by his Guardian ad litem Douglas Arnold Gibson, Individually and on Behalf of Individuals Similarly Situated and the General Public; James Dittmar, Individually and on Behalf of Individuals Similarly Situated and the General Public, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE; Larry Parrish, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Chief Administrative Officer; Thomas Ingram, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Director of Building and Safety; Scott Barber, Individually and in his Capacity as Supervising Code Enforcement Officer; Joseph Tronti, Individually and in his Capacity as Senior Code Enforcement Officer, Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided December 31, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brian J. Wright, Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland, Beverly Hills, CA, for defendants-appellants.

James D. Smith (argued), Law Office of James D. Smith, Berkeley, CA, and Elizabeth Brancart (on the briefs), Brancart & Brancart, Pescadero, CA, for plaintiffs-appellees.

Before: FLOYD R. GIBSON, KOZINSKI, and TROTT, Circuit Judges.

TROTT, Circuit Judge:

OVERVIEW

This appeal arises from an action brought by a family with minor children challenging Riverside County, California's senior citizen zoning ordinances. The district court granted (1) plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment, and (2) declaratory and injunctive relief permanently enjoining the County from enforcing its age-based zoning laws. In so doing, the district court concluded that California Government Code §...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases