1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 942 S.W.2d
  5. 942 S.W.2d 476 (1997)
 

MEIGHAN v. U.S. SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS CO.

942 S.W.2d 476 (1997)

Joe C. MEIGHAN, Jr., for himself, and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. U.S. SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

Supreme Court of Tennessee, at Knoxville.

April 7, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donald K. Vowell, Robert R. Carl, Rainwater, Humble & Vowell, A. James Andrews, Thomas A. Snapp, Knoxville, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Ben W. Hooper, III, Campbell & Hooper, R.J. Tucker, Newport, Tom Jessee, Jessee & Jessee, Johnson City, for Plaintiffs Lawrence E. McCumber and Patricia Ann McCumber.

John B. Rayson, Adrienne L. Anderson, Kramer, Rayson, Leake, Rodgers & Morgan, Knoxville, for Defendant-Appellee.

OPINION

REID, Justice.

The case is before the Court on a petition for writ of mandamus. This is one of three cases1 in which landowners have filed suit against U.S. Sprint Communications Company (Sprint), asserting claims for inverse condemnation and trespass and seeking certification as a class action. Buhl v. Sprint and the instant case, Meighan, have been before...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases