1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 132 F.3d
  5. 132 F.3d 1203 (1997)
 

BARBERS, HAIRSTYLING FOR MEN & WOMEN v. BISHOP

No. 97-2360.

132 F.3d 1203 (1997)

The BARBERS, HAIRSTYLING FOR MEN & WOMEN, INC., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Lela BISHOP, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided December 30, 1997.

Rehearing and Suggestion for Rehearing Denied January 26, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William J. McKenna, Jr., Hopkins & Sutter, Chicago, IL, Kirk W. Reilly (argued), Steven A. Mogck, Gray, Plant, Mooty, Mooty & Bennett, Minneapolis, MN, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Jacquelyn F. Kidder, Ross & Hardies, Chicago, IL, David M. Duree (argued), Robert L. Carter, Reinert & Duree, St. Louis, MO, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before EASTERBROOK, DIANE P. WOOD, and EVANS, Circuit Judges.

Rehearing and Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc Denied January 26, 1998.

EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge.

Some operators of We Care Hair® salons began a class action in state court alleging that their franchisors violated Illinois law. The suit could not have been removed under 28 U.S.C. § 1441 because it is not within the federal courts' original jurisdiction: it arises under state rather than federal law, and the parties are not of completely diverse...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases