Judgment unanimously modified as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice and as modified affirmed in accordance with the following Memorandum: Defendant was convicted following a bench trial of endangering the welfare of a child (Penal Law § 260.10 [1]). We reject the contention of defendant that Penal Law § 260.10 (1) is unconstitutionally vague as applied to him (see, People v Bergerson,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. PRUE
238 A.D.2d 944 (1997)
661 N.Y.S.2d 545
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Edgar Prue, Appellant
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Fourth Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
April 25, 1997
April 25, 1997
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Fourth Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.