1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 931 P.2d
  5. 931 P.2d 200 (1997)
 

GOAD v. HAMBRIDGE

Nos. 13692-2-III, 15029-1-III.

931 P.2d 200 (1997)

85 Wash.App. 98

James L. GOAD and Betty J. Goad, husband and wife, Appellants, v. James H. HAMBRIDGE, Jr., and Carolyn Hambridge, husband and wife, d/b/a Springdale Lumber Company, Inc., a Washington corporation, Respondents and Cross-Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel Nine.

February 18, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John A. Bardelli, Bardelli & Clayton, Spokane, for Appellants.

J. Scott Miller, Johnson, McLean, Devlin & Miller, Spokane, for Respondents and Cross-Appellants.

THOMPSON, Judge.

James and Betty Goad appeal the summary dismissal of their claims against Springdale Lumber Co., arising out of Mr. Goad's workplace injury. They claim the evidence established a factual issue whether Springdale deliberately intended the injury, so as to avoid the exclusive remedy provided by the state Industrial Insurance Act, Title 51 RCW. We affirm.

Mr. Goad's hand was severely injured when he reached in to remove a loose piece of wood...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases