BEASLEY, Judge.
Baker appeals his conviction and the denial of his motion for new trial, on the charges of terroristic threats and acts, OCGA § 16-11-37, and theft by taking, OCGA § 16-8-2.
1. Baker's first enumeration of error challenges the sufficiency of the evidence as to terroristic threats. The evidence is viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict. Searcy v. State,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.