1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 102 F.3d
  5. 102 F.3d 869 (1996)
 

E.E.O.C. v. MITSUBISHI MOTOR MFG. OF AMERICA, INC.

No. 96-3957.

102 F.3d 869 (1996)

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MITSUBISHI MOTOR MANUFACTURING OF AMERICA, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided November 27, 1996.

Opinion Issued December 16, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jean P. Kamp, submitted, John C. Hendrickson, Steven J. Levine, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Peter W. Brandt, Livingston, Barger, Brandt & Schoeder, Bloomington, IL, Walter B. Connolly, Jr., Peter W. Waldmeir, Miller, Canfield, Paddock & Stone, Detroit, MI, Alison B. Marshall, Miller, Canfield, Paddock & Stone, Washington, DC, Roy G. Davis, Keck, Mahin & Cate, Peoria, Il, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before BAUER, EASTERBROOK and KANNE, Circuit Judges.

EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge.

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission believes that sex discrimination and sexual harassment are rife at Mitsubishi's auto assembly plant in Normal, Illinois. Earlier this year the EEOC commenced a pattern-or-practice suit against Mitsubishi under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-6, on behalf of women currently or formerly employed at the plant. Like a class action under Fed. R.Civ.P. 23(b)(3), the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases