Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The trial court did not violate the defendant's right to confront and cross-examine the witnesses against him by refusing to compel the undercover officer who purchased narcotics from the defendant to reveal the exact location of the officer's so-called "Kel" transmitter, a device whose primary function is to help ensure the safety of such officers. A review of the record indicates that despite the court's limitation, the defendant...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
