MATSUSHITA ELEC. INDUSTRIAL CO. v. EPSTEIN

No. 94-1809.

516 U.S. 367 (1996)

MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD., ET AL. v. EPSTEIN et al.

United States Supreme Court.

Decided February 27, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Barry R. Ostrager argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs was Geoffrey C. Hazard, Jr.

Henry Paul Monaghan argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Harold Edgar, Roger W. Kirby, and Irving Malchman.*

Thomas, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Rehnquist, C. J., and O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, Souter, and Breyer, JJ., joined, and in which Stevens, J., joined as to Parts I, II—A, and II—C. Stevens, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part, p. 387. Ginsburg, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part, in which Stevens, J., joined, and in which Souter, J., joined as to Part II—B, p. 388.


Justice Thomas, delivered the opinion of the Court.

This case presents the question whether a federal court may withhold full faith and credit from a state-court judgment approving a class-action settlement simply because the settlement releases claims within the exclusive jurisdiction of the federal courts. The answer is no. Absent a partial repeal of the Full Faith and Credit Act, 28 U. S. C. § 1738, by another federal statute, a federal court must give the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases