Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs payable to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.
The appellant's contention that she is not liable by virtue of her status as an out-of-possession landlord was not raised before the Supreme Court and, therefore, is not properly before this Court (see, Kohilakis v Town of Smithtown,
The appellant's remaining...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.