1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 224 A.D.2d
  5. 224 A.D.2d 586 (1996)
 

HERNANDEZ v. CARTER & PARR MOBILE, INC.

224 A.D.2d 586 (1996)

638 N.Y.S.2d 686

Felipe Hernandez et al., Appellants, v. Carter and Parr Mobile, Inc., Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

February 20, 1996

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

We reject the plaintiffs' contention that they are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The jury verdict in favor of the defendant should not be set aside and judgment granted to the plaintiffs unless there is no valid line of reasoning by which the jury could have reached its conclusion (see, Cohen v Hallmark Cards, 45 N.Y.2d 493

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases