FRANCO v. MURO


224 A.D.2d 579 (1996)

638 N.Y.S.2d 690

Vincent Franco, Appellant, v. Joseph P. Muro et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

February 20, 1996


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff's contention that it was error for the trial court to exclude expert testimony concerning the standards for the design and maintenance of walkways of private homes is without merit. It is well established that the admissibility of expert testimony on any particular issue is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court (see, De Long v County of Erie, 60 N.Y.2d 296...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases