Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
It appears that the court intends to try the third-party action first, so as to determine the question of insurance coverage. Thus, we see no improvident exercise of the court's discretion in denying the motion to sever the third-party action (see, CPLR 603; see also, Harris v Manos,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.