KASNER v. KASNER


232 A.D.2d 528 (1996)

648 N.Y.S.2d 977

Caryl Kasner, Appellant, v. Victor Kasner, Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

October 21, 1996


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Modifications of pendente lite awards should rarely be made by an appellate court and then only under exigent circumstances, such as where a party is unable to meet his or her financial obligations or justice otherwise requires (see, Beige v Beige, 220 A.D.2d 636). The general rule continues to be that the proper remedy for any perceived inequity in a pendente lite award...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases