KRAMER v. KRAMER


227 A.D.2d 531 (1996)

642 N.Y.S.2d 949

Melissa Kramer, Appellant-Respondent, v. George Kramer, Respondent, and Remark Electric Corp. et al., Respondents-Appellants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

May 20, 1996


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed and cross-appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

Generally, there should be broad financial disclosure in matrimonial actions in which equitable distribution is sought to enable the parties to ascertain the nature and value of marital assets, as well as to uncover potential hidden assets (see, Gape v Gape, 125 A.D.2d 637, 638; Kaye v Kaye,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases