Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Contrary to the contention of the defendant husband, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in awarding the plaintiff wife $5,860 for closing costs paid in connection with the purchase of marital property. The record adequately supports the court's conclusion that these closing costs were paid by the plaintiff with money which constituted her own separate property (see...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
