1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 97 F.3d
  5. 97 F.3d 575 (1996)
 

ARMSTRONG v. EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

No. 95-5377.

97 F.3d 575 (1996)

Scott ARMSTRONG, Appellant, v. EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT, et al., Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided October 11, 1996.

As Amended October 25, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael E. Tankersley, Washington, DC, argued the cause, for appellant, with whom Lucinda A. Sikes and Alan B. Morrison, were on the briefs.

Michael S. Raab, Attorney, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued the cause, for appellees, with whom Frank W. Hunger, Assistant Attorney General, Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney, Leonard Schaitman, Attorney, and Freddi Lipstein, Senior Counsel, United States Department of Justice, were on the brief.

Before: WALD, SILBERMAN and SENTELLE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge SENTELLE.

Separate Dissenting Opinion filed by Circuit Judge WALD.

SENTELLE, Circuit Judge:

Appellant Scott Armstrong appeals from three of the district court's rulings in his Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit. Armstrong argues that the district court erred by failing to conduct in camera review of four documents, by accepting an internally inconsistent explanation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases