SENTEX SYSTEMS, INC. v. HARTFORD ACC. & INDEM. CO.

No. 95-55980.

93 F.3d 578 (1996)

SENTEX SYSTEMS, INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY COMPANY, a Connecticut corporation, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided August 19, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph P. Mascovich, Crosby, Heafy, Roach & May, Oakland, California; Kelley K. Beck, Hawkins, Schnabel, Lindahl & Beck, Los Angeles, California, for defendant-appellant.

Carol L. Meedon, Callahan, Blaine & Williams, Irvine, California, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before: HUG, Chief Judge, and SCHROEDER and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.


SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge:

This is an action by an insured against an insurer for breach of the insurer's duty to defend a suit which the insured claims triggered coverage under the policy provisions relating to "advertising injury." This is a diversity action controlled by California law concerning the interpretation of insurance contracts. The district court entered summary judgment in favor of the insured, Sentex Systems, and the insurer, Hartford Accident and Indemnity...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases