Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The appellant contends that the Family Court erred by ordering that he be placed in a restrictive setting. We disagree. Family Court Act § 353.5 (1) provides, inter alia, that when, as in this case, the appellant is found to have committed a designated felony act, the court shall determine, based on a preponderance of the evidence, whether or not the appellant requires placement...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
