1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 227 A.D.2d
  5. 227 A.D.2d 424 (1996)
 

ACOSTA v. FID. NEW YORK

227 A.D.2d 424 (1996)

643 N.Y.S.2d 361

Salomon Acosta, Appellant, v. Fidelity New York et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

May 13, 1996

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted the defendants' motion to dismiss the plaintiff's second and third causes of action sounding in defamation. The plaintiff failed to comply with the requirement set forth in CPLR 3016 (a) that the "particular words complained of shall be set forth in the complaint" (CPLR 3016 [a]; see also, Varela v Investors Ins. Holding Corp.,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases