Ordered that the amended supplemental judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Contrary to the appellants' contention, the record does not reflect that the court overlooked a $10,000 payment to the respondent Graco Construction Corp. Moreover, the appellant William Eves was not entitled to a stay pursuant to CPLR 321
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.