Assuming plaintiff was derelict in not filing a "notice to reschedule" with the "appropriate clerk" after this Court's affirmance of the order granting a new trial, as required by 22 NYCRR 202.45, or should otherwise be deemed to have either abandoned the action within the meaning of CPLR 3404 or failed to prosecute it within the meaning of CPLR 3216, nevertheless the three-year delay should be excused, and the trial go forward, given the general policy favoring dispositions...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.