1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 289 N.J.
  5. 289 N.J. Super. 267 (1996)
 

BITSKO v. MAIN PHARMACY, INC.

289 N.J. Super. 267 (1996)

673 A.2d 825

BLODWEN BITSKO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. MAIN PHARMACY, INC. AND DENIS CAMPBELL, J/S/A, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided April 4, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carol F. Laskin argued the cause for appellant (Ms. Laskin, on the brief).

James J. Carroll, III argued the cause for respondents (Brown, Michael & Carroll, P.C., attorneys; Mr. Carroll, on the brief).

Before Judges SKILLMAN, PAUL G. LEVY and EICHEN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by EICHEN, J.A.D.

This is an employment discrimination case. Plaintiff, a registered pharmacist, contends she suffered unlawful gender and age discrimination because she was paid less than younger male pharmacists performing comparable work. The appeal presents issues under the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination, N.J.S.A. 10:5-1 to -42 (LAD), concerning the proper methodology for determining gender and age discrimination...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases