1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 224 A.D.2d
  5. 224 A.D.2d 332 (1996)
 

TIFFANY & CO. v. SMITH

224 A.D.2d 332 (1996)

638 N.Y.S.2d 454

Tiffany & Company, Petitioner, v. Paula Smith et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

February 27, 1996

The time limitations set forth in Executive Law § 297 (2) (a) and (4) (a) are directory, not mandatory, and petitioner has failed to demonstrate any prejudice as a result of the delay in processing the complaint (see, Matter of 935 Nicholas Renting Assocs. v State Div. of Human Rights, 223 A.D.2d 377). Claims arising from petitioner's employees' discriminatory conduct were not time-barred since there was continuing impact...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases