PEOPLE v. PINCKNEY


227 A.D.2d 317 (1996)

643 N.Y.S.2d 337

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Nathaniel Pinckney, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

May 28, 1996


Having failed to raise any objection during the trial, defendant's claim that the prosecutor's summation improperly suggested that he fabricated his intoxication defense is unpreserved for appellate review (People v Balls, 69 N.Y.2d 641), and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review it, we would find that none of the challenged comments require reversal, especially in light of the overwhelming evidence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases