We find no violation of CPLR 4110-b, and, even if there were, no resulting prejudice requiring reversal. It does not appear that plaintiffs were prevented from arguing the case effectively and intelligently by the claimed failure to conduct a precharge conference, or that they requested permission to reopen their summation after the charge (see, Altman v Deepdale Gen. Hosp.,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.