The motion court properly determined, after an in camera examination, that the medical records sought would not be useful in determining the nature and extent of the injuries attributable to the accident or any aspect of plaintiff's damages (see, Wachtman v Trocaire Coll.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
RUSSELL v. KLEINMAN
232 A.D.2d 287 (1996)
648 N.Y.S.2d 913
Maurice V. Russell, Respondent, v. Stewart Kleinman, Appellant
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
October 24, 1996
October 24, 1996
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.