KORN v. PRINCZ


226 A.D.2d 278 (1996)

641 N.Y.S.2d 283

Richard J. Korn, Appellant, v. Gary Princz et al., Respondents. (And Another Action.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

April 25, 1996


The IAS Court properly characterized the allegations underlying the first cause of action as one for defamation and properly dismissed it as time-barred under the applicable one-year Statute of Limitations (CPLR 215 [3]). The complaint did not state a cause of action for tortious interference with prospective business relations, as plaintiff now asserts (see, WFB Telecommunications v NYNEX Corp., 188 A.D.2d 257, lv denied 81 N.Y.2d 709), since there is no allegation that plaintiff was actually and wrongfully prevented from entering into or continuing in a specific business relationship (McGill v Parker, 179 A.D.2d 98, 105) as a result of defendants' conduct (Mandelblatt v Devon Stores, 132 A.D.2d 162, 169).


Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases