The IAS Court properly granted plaintiffs' motion to amend the pleadings to conform to the proof at trial. The complaint clearly alleged that defendant and her husband had placed "onto check stubs false information" and had improperly "made out `CASH' checks and had them endorsed by [defendant's husband]". These allegations were repeated in plaintiffs' reply to a demand for a bill of particulars. Since defendant was on notice that this checkwriting practice was at the heart...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
