LIPTAK v. RITE AID, INC.


289 N.J. Super. 199 (1996)

673 A.2d 309

ANGELA LIPTAK, ALLISON MARIE LIPTAK, AN INFANT THE AGE OF 14 BY HER GUARDIAN AD LITEM, JOSEPH LIPTAK, AND JOSEPH LIPTAK, INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. RITE AID, INC. A/K/A NO. 1736 T/A RITE AID PHARMACY AND ALEX MELLO, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided April 2, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Issac Henkoff argued the cause for appellants (Chapman, Henkoff, Kessler, Peduto & Saffer, attorneys; Mr. Henkoff, of counsel and on the brief; Diane Bongiovanni, also on the brief).

Grace J. Velardo argued the cause for respondents (Velardo, Koprowski & Delgado, attorneys; Ms. Velardo, of counsel and on the brief).

Before Judges PETRELLA, P.G. LEVY, and EICHEN.


The opinion of the court was delivered by PETRELLA, P.J.A.D.

Plaintiffs Angela Liptak, her daughter, Allison Marie Liptak, and her husband, Joseph Liptak,1 appeal from a jury verdict of no cause of action against them on their complaint against Rite Aid, Inc. and Alex Mello for false imprisonment. Their motion for a new trial was denied.

On their way to go food shopping, Liptak...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases