1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 83 F.3d
  5. 83 F.3d 403 (1996)
 

TEETS v. CHROMALLOY GAS TURBINE CORP.

Nos. 95-1379, 95-1389.

83 F.3d 403 (1996)

J. Michael TEETS, Plaintiff/Cross-Appellant, v. CHROMALLOY GAS TURBINE CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Rehearing Denied; Suggestion for Rehearing Declined July 1, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert E. Pershes, Pershes & Schwartz, P.A., Coral Springs, Florida, argued, for plaintiff/cross-appellant.

Stanley H. Lieberstein, Ostrolenk, Faber, Gerb & Soffen, L.L.P., New York City, argued, for defendant-appellant. With him on the brief were Douglas A. Miro and Marc A. Lieberstein.

Before NEWMAN, MICHEL, and RADER, Circuit Judges.

Rehearing Denied; Suggestion for Rehearing In Banc Declined July 1, 1996.

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge RADER, Circuit Judge NEWMAN concurs in the result.

RADER, Circuit Judge.

Chromalloy Gas Turbine Corporation (Chromalloy) and J. Michael Teets dispute ownership of an invention called the hot forming process (HFP). Following a bench trial, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida concluded that Teets solely...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases