1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 224 A.D.2d
  5. 224 A.D.2d 262 (1996)
 

AMANKWA v. NEW YORK CITY HOUS. AUTH.

224 A.D.2d 262 (1996)

637 N.Y.S.2d 717

Steven Amankwa, Respondent, v. New York City Housing Authority, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

February 13, 1996

Since defendant's "renewal" motion was, in essence, a motion for "reargument", the order denying the motion is not appealable (Oppenheimer & Co. v Oppenheim, Appel, Dixon & Co., 173 A.D.2d 203, 204). Defendant's "renewal" motion was based on citation of recent cases that merely reaffirmed existing law and thus, did not constitute new "law not previously considered" by the IAS Court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases