KELLY v. RUBIN


224 A.D.2d 262 (1996)

642 N.Y.S.2d 204

Carolyn Kelly et al., Appellants, v. Bernard Rubin, Defendant, and Joseph Somma, Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

February 13, 1996


Defendant Somma established that he was not negligent as a matter of law by producing admissible, uncontradicted evidence that his car sustained a sudden tire blowout, and it never came into contact with plaintiffs' or codefendant's vehicles (see, Menekou v Crean, 222 A.D.2d 418). Not only did plaintiffs fail to adduce any proof showing any negligence on Somma's part, but they also failed to offer any evidence which would...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases