Contrary to defendant's unpreserved contention, the arresting officer's testimony, which, after recounting the detailed description of the seller's clothing, race, height and gender received over the radio from an experienced undercover officer, was to the effect that defendant was arrested because he was "dressed the same" as the person described in the transmission, provided an ample factual basis on which to conclude that the seller and defendant were the same person,...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.