Respondent presented documentary evidence of its cancellation of the policy in question, together with testimony of one of its employees, who was knowledgeable about its cancellation procedures, that such procedures were in conformity with the statutory requirements of the New York Automobile Insurance Plan. This created a rebuttable presumption that the notice of cancellation was received (Matter of State-Wide Ins. Co. v Simmons,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MATTER OF LORA
232 A.D.2d 242 (1996)
648 N.Y.S.2d 91
In the Matter of the Arbitration between Ramon Lora, Respondent, and New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance Company, Appellant. In the Matter of the Arbitration between New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance Company, Appellant, and Ramon Lora, Respondent. Globe Indemnity Company et al., Respondents
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
October 15, 1996
October 15, 1996
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
