GOLDBERG v. LEE EXPRESS CAB CORP.


227 A.D.2d 241 (1996)

642 N.Y.S.2d 292

Marina B. Goldberg et al., Respondents, v. Lee Express Cab Corporation et al., Respondents, and Natan More, Also Known as Nathan More, et al., Appellants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

May 16, 1996


The IAS Court properly concluded that cognizable claims for piercing the corporate veil were stated in the complaint (see, 29/35 Realty Assocs. v 35th St. N. Y. Yarn Ctr., 181 A.D.2d 540, 541). Plaintiffs' claim that all of the corporate defendants are part of a larger corporate combine is particularized and includes, for example, specific allegations that all of the corporations' cabs are centrally maintained and garaged...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases