1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 219 A.D.2d
  5. 219 A.D.2d 249 (1996)
 

S & S MACH. v. MFRS. HANOVER

219 A.D.2d 249 (1996)

638 N.Y.S.2d 953

S & S Machinery Corp., Appellant, v. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

March 14, 1996

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alfred R. Fabricant and Lawrence C. Drucker of counsel, New York City (Fabricant & Yeskoo, P. C., attorneys), for appellant.

Robert T. Stephenson of counsel, New York City (Andrew N. Keen on the brief; Chemical Bank Legal Department, attorneys), for respondents.

MURPHY, P. J., WALLACH, KUPFERMAN and ROSS, JJ., concur.

WILLIAMS, J.

The issue on this appeal is whether the defendant bank processed and responded to plaintiff judgment creditor's restraining notice and information subpoena in a reasonable manner, as a matter of law.

This action is the result of plaintiff's efforts to enforce a judgment obtained in July 1991 against Masinexportimport (Masin), a Romanian trading company, in the amount of $1,573,163.20 plus...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases