1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 232 A.D.2d
  5. 232 A.D.2d 215 (1996)
 

MATTER OF MAURY v. FREDERICK GOLDMAN, INC.

232 A.D.2d 215 (1996)

648 N.Y.S.2d 80

In the Matter of Pilar Z. Maury, Petitioner, v. Frederick Goldman, Inc., et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

October 8, 1996

The determination of respondent was supported by substantial evidence in the record. There was no proof of a retaliatory firing presented by petitioner and the employer was experiencing financial difficulties. The petitioner was not replaced by a male, her position was eliminated and her duties were assumed by another female already on staff. We have considered petitioner's other arguments, including that respondent employer's attorney...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases