Plaintiff's attempts to correct the misstatements of its assignor at his first examination under oath that he was the true owner of the subject property and used his own funds for its purchase, in a correction sheet submitted a year and a half later and at a subsequent examination under oath, were properly rejected by the IAS Court as "disingenuous". These willful misrepresentations were of a material nature, violating the fraud and concealment provision of the policy, and...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
