The trial court properly admitted both the physical evidence recovered and police testimony that it was recovered either from defendant or from his cohort after their simultaneous arrest within minutes of the robbery herein. Such evidence was relevant to the jury's consideration of the issue of whether the complainant correctly identified defendant and his cohort as the perpetrators of the robbery (see, People v Mirenda,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. GONZALEZ
232 A.D.2d 204 (1996)
648 N.Y.S.2d 78
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Edward Gonzalez, Appellant
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
October 8, 1996
October 8, 1996
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
