STOCKBRIDGE SCHOOL DIST. v. DPI

No. 94-1867.

202 Wis.2d 214 (1996)

550 N.W.2d 96

STOCKBRIDGE SCHOOL DISTRICT, Petitioner-Appellant-Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION SCHOOL DISTRICT BOUNDARY APPEAL BOARD, Respondent-Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided June 25, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the petitioner-appellant-petitioner there were briefs by Robert W. Burns, Thomas E. Griggs, Paul C. Hemmer and Godfrey & Kahn, S.C., Green Bay and oral argument by Thomas E. Griggs and Robert W. Burns.

For the respondent-respondent the cause was argued by Laura Sutherland, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was James E. Doyle, attorney general.


ANN WALSH BRADLEY, J.

The petitioner, Stockbridge School District (Stockbridge), seeks review of a published decision of the court of appeals.1 That decision affirmed an order of the circuit court for Manitowoc County, Fred H. Hazlewood, Judge, which affirmed decisions of the respondent, Department of Public Instruction School District Boundary Appeal Board ("the Board"). Stockbridge argues...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases